Power Purchase Aggrements (PPA) are often positioned as simple, low-risk solutions. In reality, they embed long-term pricing, escalation, and control assumptions that materially affect value over time.
Once signed, those assumptions are expensive to reverse.
Buyout prices are often presented without clarity on how they compare to continued PPA payments or alternative ownership structures.
PPA providers optimize for deal economics, not necessarily long-term value for the asset owner.
Escalators, performance degradation, market pricing, and policy changes can materially shift outcomes over a 15–25 year contract.
We independently evaluate PPA terms, buyout options, and ownership scenarios to clarify long-term costs, risks, and strategic trade-offs.
The goal is not to push ownership or a PPA. The goal is to identify which structure holds up economically over time.
Identify whether buyout options are fairly priced or if staying in the PPA delivers better long-term value.
Understand how escalators, performance assumptions, and market changes affect total cost over a 15–25 year horizon.
Replace rules of thumb and vendor narratives with defensible economic comparisons you can stand behind.
A structured review of PPA economics and ownership alternatives to support confident, defensible decisions.
We deliver clear, independent economic analysis that enables decision-makers to allocate capital with confidence across clean energy and sustainability investments.
We work with policymakers, regulators, utilities, and investors making high-stakes clean energy and sustainability decisions where economic precision and accountability are required.
You are evaluating or managing $5M+ clean energy investments.
You need defensible economic analysis.
You are comparing multiple project structures or proposals.
Your decision will be reviewed by regulators, boards, or the public.
Your internal financial models exceed 10–20 assumptions.
Your project lifespan is 15–30 years.
Real Estate Investors
Institutional and private investors assessing how energy costs, regulation, and sustainability requirements affect asset value and long-term returns.
Real Estate Owners & Developers
Organizations evaluating on-site solar, PPAs, or energy retrofits across commercial, industrial, or multi-family portfolios.
Renewable Energy Developers
Developers comparing project structures, pricing assumptions, and long-term economics before committing capital.
Policymakers & Regulators
State and local agencies evaluating clean energy, environmental, land use, or housing policies that require defensible cost–benefit and economic impact analysis.
Utilities & Energy Authorities
Public and private utilities assessing solar, storage, grid investments, and compliance costs under regulatory and reliability constraints.
Public & Institutional Asset Managers
Universities, municipalities, and public entities managing large property portfolios with long investment horizons and accountability requirements.
Use a short consultation to determine whether cost–benefit analysis is the right next step.
Ongoing economic support for repeated clean energy investment decisions.
Clarify economic requirements and decision criteria prior to formal analysis.
Compare actual results to projections to evaluate investment performance.
Sacramento, California, USA
