After installation, many projects are assumed to be successful as long as they are operational. In practice, actual performance often diverges from projections due to pricing changes, operational issues, degradation, or flawed assumptions made at the outset.
Without independent financial review, underperformance can persist unnoticed and lessons are not carried forward.
Savings, revenues, and costs drift from forecasts without clear explanation.
It is unclear whether issues stem from pricing, usage, system performance, or structural assumptions.
Without post-analysis, the same assumptions are reused in new projects.
We compare real performance to original financial assumptions to determine whether the investment delivered as expected, where gaps emerged, and what can be improved going forward.
The goal is not fault-finding. The goal is learning, accountability, and better capital decisions next time.
Understand whether savings, revenues, and returns are tracking against expectations.
Use real results to refine assumptions, pricing, and structures for future projects.
Key cost, performance, and return assumptions are reviewed and stress-tested before capital is committed.
A structured financial review based on actual operating data.
We deliver clear, independent economic analysis that enables decision-makers to allocate capital with confidence across clean energy and sustainability investments.
We work with policymakers, regulators, utilities, and investors making high-stakes clean energy and sustainability decisions where economic precision and accountability are required.
You are evaluating or managing $5M+ clean energy investments.
You need defensible economic analysis.
You are comparing multiple project structures or proposals.
Your decision will be reviewed by regulators, boards, or the public.
Your internal financial models exceed 10–20 assumptions.
Your project lifespan is 15–30 years.
Real Estate Investors
Institutional and private investors assessing how energy costs, regulation, and sustainability requirements affect asset value and long-term returns.
Real Estate Owners & Developers
Organizations evaluating on-site solar, PPAs, or energy retrofits across commercial, industrial, or multi-family portfolios.
Renewable Energy Developers
Developers comparing project structures, pricing assumptions, and long-term economics before committing capital.
Policymakers & Regulators
State and local agencies evaluating clean energy, environmental, land use, or housing policies that require defensible cost–benefit and economic impact analysis.
Utilities & Energy Authorities
Public and private utilities assessing solar, storage, grid investments, and compliance costs under regulatory and reliability constraints.
Public & Institutional Asset Managers
Universities, municipalities, and public entities managing large property portfolios with long investment horizons and accountability requirements.
Use a short consultation to determine whether cost–benefit analysis is the right next step.
Ongoing economic support for repeated clean energy investment decisions.
Clarify economic requirements and decision criteria prior to formal analysis.
Compare actual results to projections to evaluate investment performance.
Sacramento, California, USA
