Installer proposals are built using different assumptions, pricing structures, and performance forecasts, making side-by-side comparison difficult.
Without independent validation, decision-makers are left to rely on vendor-provided models that may obscure true costs, risks, and long-term performance.
Installers use their own assumptions for pricing, performance, incentives, degradation, and timelines, making proposals look comparable when the underlying economics are not.
Quoted savings and payback periods often exclude key costs, contingencies, or downside scenarios that materially affect long-term outcomes.
Installer models are typically structured to highlight projected benefits, making it difficult to assess true economic value and risk without independent review.
We independently review pricing, assumptions, and performance claims so you can compare proposals on true economic value, understand downside risk, and choose the option that best protects your investment.
Compare installer quotes using consistent economic assumptions.
Identify optimistic inputs and hidden costs before committing.
Make capital decisions with independent validation.
An independent, like-for-like evaluation of installer proposals to clarify true cost, risk, and value before you sign.
We deliver clear, independent economic analysis that enables decision-makers to allocate capital with confidence across clean energy and sustainability investments.
We work with policymakers, regulators, utilities, and investors making high-stakes clean energy and sustainability decisions where economic precision and accountability are required.
You are evaluating or managing $5M+ clean energy investments.
You need defensible economic analysis.
You are comparing multiple project structures or proposals.
Your decision will be reviewed by regulators, boards, or the public.
Your internal financial models exceed 10–20 assumptions.
Your project lifespan is 15–30 years.
Real Estate Investors
Institutional and private investors assessing how energy costs, regulation, and sustainability requirements affect asset value and long-term returns.
Real Estate Owners & Developers
Organizations evaluating on-site solar, PPAs, or energy retrofits across commercial, industrial, or multi-family portfolios.
Renewable Energy Developers
Developers comparing project structures, pricing assumptions, and long-term economics before committing capital.
Policymakers & Regulators
State and local agencies evaluating clean energy, environmental, land use, or housing policies that require defensible cost–benefit and economic impact analysis.
Utilities & Energy Authorities
Public and private utilities assessing solar, storage, grid investments, and compliance costs under regulatory and reliability constraints.
Public & Institutional Asset Managers
Universities, municipalities, and public entities managing large property portfolios with long investment horizons and accountability requirements.
Use a short consultation to determine whether cost–benefit analysis is the right next step.
Ongoing economic support for repeated clean energy investment decisions.
Clarify economic requirements and decision criteria prior to formal analysis.
Compare actual results to projections to evaluate investment performance.
Sacramento, California, USA
