Major clean energy and sustainability investments are often approved before their full economic implications are clearly understood. Decisions rely on projections, vendor models, or internal assumptions that haven’t been independently tested
Projected returns, costs, and performance inputs are accepted without stress-testing, masking downside exposure and mispricing risk.
Alternative project structures, scales, or timing options are rarely evaluated side-by-side, limiting informed capital decisions.
Without rigorous analysis, decision-makers lack visibility into the conditions required for success and how outcomes change if assumptions do not hold.
Independent cost–benefit analysis that brings economic clarity to investment decisions before capital is committed.
Clear, defensible economic insights for capital allocation decisions, enabling you to proceed, restructure, or walk away with confidence.A focused review of costs, returns, risks, and alternatives to clarify the full economics before investment decisions are made.
Key cost, performance, and return assumptions are reviewed and stress-tested before capital is committed.
Evaluate costs, benefits, and value drivers across the full project lifecycle so decisions are not based on upside alone.
Assess multiple structures, scales, and scenarios to understand relative value, downside risk, and opportunity cost.
A focused review of costs, returns, risks, and alternatives to clarify the full economics before investment decisions are made.
We deliver clear, independent economic analysis that enables decision-makers to allocate capital with confidence across clean energy and sustainability investments.
We work with policymakers, regulators, utilities, and investors making high-stakes clean energy and sustainability decisions where economic precision and accountability are required.
You are evaluating or managing $5M+ clean energy investments.
You need defensible economic analysis.
You are comparing multiple project structures or proposals.
Your decision will be reviewed by regulators, boards, or the public.
Your internal financial models exceed 10–20 assumptions.
Your project lifespan is 15–30 years.
Real Estate Investors
Institutional and private investors assessing how energy costs, regulation, and sustainability requirements affect asset value and long-term returns.
Real Estate Owners & Developers
Organizations evaluating on-site solar, PPAs, or energy retrofits across commercial, industrial, or multi-family portfolios.
Renewable Energy Developers
Developers comparing project structures, pricing assumptions, and long-term economics before committing capital.
Policymakers & Regulators
State and local agencies evaluating clean energy, environmental, land use, or housing policies that require defensible cost–benefit and economic impact analysis.
Utilities & Energy Authorities
Public and private utilities assessing solar, storage, grid investments, and compliance costs under regulatory and reliability constraints.
Public & Institutional Asset Managers
Universities, municipalities, and public entities managing large property portfolios with long investment horizons and accountability requirements.
Use a short consultation to determine whether cost–benefit analysis is the right next step.
Ongoing economic support for repeated clean energy investment decisions.
Clarify economic requirements and decision criteria prior to formal analysis.
Compare actual results to projections to evaluate investment performance.
Sacramento, California, USA
